Monday, January 04, 2010

Karsh at the WAG



I started the New Year by visiting the Karsh show at the WAG. Seems everyone else had the same idea to catch the show before it was gone, as it was the most crowded I have ever been in a show! People lined up to shuffle along the walls, with barely any room between them. Serves me right for waiting so long!
While the size of the show was impressive, I wasn't happy with the quality. I know Rob complained of the lighting, but having come from the Steichen show in TO I know the lighting was sufficient. I think the problem was the quality of the framing, specifically the glass. It was so reflective! To enjoy the dark rich tones of the prints, I'd have to step forward and cover the print from the reflections from around the room. I can also see why the Steichen show was shown on dark walls. The white walls of the other side of the Karsh show would reflect badly in each piece.

But beyond those shortcomings, it was a wonderful show, with an amazing career covered. The prints were exquisite and seeing some of these images up close and personal reminded me of the power of a good print. While the write talked about Karsh being the victim of his one success and be hemmed in by his technique, I think it's a testament to the time that a photographer was able to hone his vision over years.




Bookmark and Share

3 Comments:

Blogger Adrian J.K. Shum, CGD said...

Glad to hear that you were able to make it out to see the show at the WAG!

I would agree with your observations... definitely one of the most 'packed' audiences I've ever seen at the WAG, and would definitely have benefited from having less reflective surfaces (be it walls or glass).

Either way, an amazing exhibit IMO. Cheers!

1:23 PM  
Blogger Robert said...

When I saw the show on a early December evening, I was the only person there other than an student art group who were there to discuss it.

I wanted to distance myself from the group because I found it too distracting. So I just walked into another room and I was all alone with the prints.

Maybe it was the high reflective glass that I found distracting. I just couldn't see as much detail as I could with the online images.

I dunno what I would have done with people elbow to elbow.

8:05 PM  
Blogger tobanphoto said...

Certainly agree re; quality.

I thought the images in his books (specifically Faces of our Time) was higher quality than getting close to the glass.

DL

11:40 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home